whatmodel.sh / Jamba 1.6 Large
Jamba 1.6 Large
↗ share
+ contribute
Jamba 1.6 Large is an open-weights language model from AI21 Labs, released February 2025. Its published size is 398.56B parameters (94B active per token). Licence: other (jamba-open-model-license).
Catalogue identity notes
Maker repo ai21labs/AI21-Jamba-Large-1.6 @f75d35d: licence tag other (jamba-open-model-license). 398,555,145,696 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata; active 94B per token (same architecture size as Jamba Large (AI21 docs: 'Jamba Large 398B parameters (94B active)'; see catalogue jamba-large-1-7)). Released 2025-02: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2025-02-27). Gated repository (licence acceptance required on Hugging Face).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Jamba 1.6 Large, out of 1132 with a score, then more from AI21 Labs.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 330 | 58±3 | comparison only | |||
| 331 | 58±1 | api $0.80/M +local | |||
| 332 | 58±11 | local | |||
| 333 | 58±1 | api $0.22/M +local | |||
| 334 | 58±1 | local | |||
| more from AI21 Labs | |||||
| 485 | 53±10 | local | |||
| 526 | 52±15 | api price unknown +local | |||
| 560 | 50±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
other tests1 not in a task · 46% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 97.7% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 118/140 | 46% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~797.11 GB · from huggingface.co/ai21labs (official)
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='ai21labs/AI21-Jamba-Large-1.6', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ai21labs ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Vectara hallucination leaderb… 46%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 54% | |
| weighted average | = 58.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json