whatmodel.sh / Hunyuan-Standard (2025-02-10)

Hunyuan-Standard (2025-02-10) is a closed-weights language model from Tencent, released February 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'hunyuan-standard-2025-02-10' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'hunyuan-standard-2025-02-10' as 'Hunyuan-Standard-2025-02-10' (Tencent, Proprietary), linking https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1729/104753. Released 2025-02: Tencent Cloud Hunyuan version changelog (document 1729/97765) / date in the API id. The 2025-02-10 version update of the closed hunyuan-standard API model (Tencent changelog). Retired.

54.9±3.3comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Hunyuan-Standard (2025-02-10), out of 1132 with a score, then more from Tencent.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
420GigaChat 3.5 Ultra Instruct (432B-A28B) Sber55±1local~457GB2026-07
421Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Meta55±1api $2.40/M +local~160GB2024-07
422Hunyuan-Standard (2025-02-10) Tencent55±3comparison only2025-02
423PLLuM-12B-nc-chat (2507) PLLuM consortium (CYFRAGOVPL)55±4local~27GB2025-07
424EXAONE 3.5 32B Instruct LG AI Research55±4local~20GB2024-12
more from Tencent
16Hy4 preview (770B-A49B) Tencent79±1api $1.25/M +local~248GB2026-08
57Hunyuan Hy3 (295B-A21B) Tencent74±1api $0.23/M +local~96GB2026-07
139Hy3 preview (295B-A21B) Tencent68±1local~629GB2026-04

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #290 of 579 * · 95% of its score · 1 test

Beats Granite 4.2 8B, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking, Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, Granite 4.0 H Micro 3B, Gemma 3n E4B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1311.3 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 140/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 95%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 95%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 5%
weighted average= 54.9

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json