whatmodel.sh / tts / Octave TTS (Octave 1)
Octave TTS (Octave 1)
↗ share
+ contribute
Octave TTS (Octave 1) is a closed-weights text-to-speech model from Hume AI, released February 2025. Licence: proprietary.
Score within the Vapi Humanness · Bradley–Terry rating, 2026-09-25 snapshot comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The text-to-speech models ranked either side of Octave TTS (Octave 1), out of 148 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | 59±4 | comparison only | |
| 55 | 58±4 | api $26.00/M chars | |
| 56 | 58±4 | api $50.00/M chars | |
| 57 | 58±2 | api $65.00/M chars | |
| 58 | 58±2 | comparison only |
see all text-to-speech models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
other tests4 not in a task · 94% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmergentTTS · 6-category preference | 46.8% ✎ | ▅▅▃▃█▅▅▃·▃·▅ beats 13/16 | 50% |
| InstructTTSEval EN · mean instruction-following score (APS, DSD, RP) | 71.1% ✎ | ▄····█··▄··▄ beats 2/4 | 21% |
| EmergentTTS · v1 paper automatic MOS (WV-MOS) | 4.18 / 5 ✎ | ▄·█·█▄····█▄ beats 6/8 | 12% |
| EmergentTTS · 6-category WER | 12.8% ✎ | ▂▄··▂▄▄··█▄▆ beats 10/16 | 11% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $50.00/M chars · www.hume.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M characters: Hume lists Octave 1 additional-character usage at $0.05 per 1,000 characters on the Business plan ($500/month; lowest published self-serve rate); Creator $0.15, Pro $0.12, Scale $0.10 per 1,000 on lower plans (x1000). Product: Octave text-to-speech API. API model: Octave 1. Settings: Business-plan usage-based overage. Price basis: published list rate, per-1K to per-1M scaling only. Exclusions: monthly plan fee, included characters, EVI. Currency: USD. Hume official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25.
$ how the score was worked out · EmergentTTS-Eval six-category… 61%, InstructTTSEval: instruction-… 21%, EmergentTTS-Eval v1 paper (ar… 12%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 61% | |
| 1 | 21% | |
| 1 | 12% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 6% | |
| weighted average | = 57.9 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json