whatmodel.sh / Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning)

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning) is a closed-weights language model from SpaceXAI (xAI), released November 2025. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

xAI API model 'grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning', the non-reasoning mode of Grok 4.1 Fast; a separate API model id from the catalogued grok-4-1-fast-reasoning (whose identity note already calls the non-reasoning variant distinct). Release month taken from the reasoning sibling (same Grok 4.1 Fast launch). Proposed so its BFCL V4 (2025-12-16) and Vectara hallucination-leaderboard rows can be recorded; both are multi-model runs.

65.7±4.5#144 of 949 LLMsfrom 2 benchmark results across 2 sources* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning), out of 1132 with a score, then more from SpaceXAI (xAI).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
179Spark-X2.5 4B iFLYTEK (SparkLLM)66±1local~3.9GB2026-08
180MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax66±1local~79GB2025-12
181Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning) SpaceXAI (xAI)66±5api $0.28/M2025-11
182Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B NVIDIA66±1local~20GB2026-03
183Laguna XS 2.1 (33B-A3B) Poolside66±2local~21GB2026-06
more from SpaceXAI (xAI)
30Grok 4.6 SpaceXAI (xAI)77±1api $3.00/M2026-08
42Grok 4.5 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-07
47Grok 4.7 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #129 of 334 * · 91% of its score · 1 test

Beats o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large, MiniCPM5 2B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive)58.3% ✎▁▁▁▂██▅▅▆▃▂▂ beats 69/77hard · avg 32%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 91%at its level
other tests1 not in a task · 0.1% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)82.2% ✎▁▂▃▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 9/98very easy · avg 90%▇ 0.1%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Microsoft Azure · $0.28/M · $0.2 in / $0.5 out per 1M tokens · 128k context · learn.microsoft.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, Azure AI Foundry Models pay-as-you-go (xAI Grok table), row 'Grok 4.1 Fast Global': input $0.20, output $0.50 (us-east; the amounts are in the page's price-data attributes). The row is not split by reasoning mode; Azure's Foundry models page lists grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning and grok-4.1-fast-reasoning as separate deployable chat-completion models. Same price row as the catalogued grok-4-1-fast-reasoning. Microsoft Azure official pricing page, observed 2026-10-09.

$ how the score was worked out · Berkeley Function Calling Lea… 91%, Vectara hallucination leaderb… 0%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 91%Apache-2.0
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (vectara/hallucination-leaderboard repository)1▇ 0%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇ 9%
weighted average= 65.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json