whatmodel.sh / GPT4All-13B-Snoozy
GPT4All-13B-Snoozy
↗ share
+ contribute
GPT4All-13B-Snoozy is an open-weights language model from Nomic AI, released April 2023. Its published size is 13B parameters. Licence: gpl.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison-only. Arena entry 'gpt4all-13b-snoozy' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'gpt4all-13b-snoozy' as 'GPT4All-13B-Snoozy' (Nomic AI, Non-commercial), linking https://huggingface.co/nomic-ai/gpt4all-13b-snoozy. Maker repo nomic-ai/gpt4all-13b-snoozy @8e4f7bb: licence tag gpl. Parameters: nominal (card: 'A finetuned LLama 13B model'). Released 2023-04: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-04-24).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of GPT4All-13B-Snoozy, out of 828 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 768 | 27±2 | local | |
| 769 | 26±3 | comparison only | |
| 770 | 26±2 | local | |
| 771 | 26±1 | local | |
| 772 | 26±1 | local |
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▃▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #383 of 393 · 98% of its score · 3 tests
Beats Phi-2 (2.7B), Falcon 40B Instruct, ChatGLM3-6B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Granite 4.0 350M here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024) | 924.0 ✎ | ▂▁▃▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 6/95 | 34% |
| LMArena (text) | 1067.6 ✎ | ▁▁▃▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 10/379 | 34% |
| MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs) | 5.4100 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎ | ▆▂▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 11/28 | 30% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~52.06 GB · from huggingface.co/nomic-ai (official)
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='nomic-ai/gpt4all-13b-snoozy', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/nomic-ai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 34%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 34%, LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboa… 30%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34% | |
| 1 | 34% | |
| 1 | 30% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 26.3 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json