whatmodel.sh / GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro
↗ share
+ contribute
GPT-5.2 Pro is a closed-weights language model from OpenAI, released December 2025. Licence: proprietary.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-12-11). Epoch label gpt-5.2-pro-2025-12-11 (default and only snapshot). Distinct from gpt-5-2.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of GPT-5.2 Pro, out of 828 with a score, then more from OpenAI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 77±1 | api $2.00/M | |||
| 25 | 77±1 | api $6.00/M +local | |||
| 26 | 77±1 | api $57.75/M | |||
| 27 | 77±1 | api $0.17/M +local | |||
| 28 | 77±1 | api $0.20/M | |||
| more from OpenAI | |||||
| 1 | 87±1 | api $20.00/M | |||
| 3 | 85±1 | api $4.00/M | |||
| 7 | 83±1 | api $4.00/M | |||
$ what it's good at
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▃▁▁ #21 of 398 * · 84% of its score · 2 tests
Beats DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GPT-5.6 Luna, GPT-6 Luna here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath tier 4 v2 | 46.0% ✎ | ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▂▁▁▁▁ beats 43/63 | 44% |
| FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2 | 74.0% ✎ | ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▅▃▃ beats 62/82 | 40% |
other tests2 not in a task · 16% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 public evaluation set (ARC Prize model_baseline, pass@2) | 37.9% ✎ | █··▂▅▁▃▁▃·▁▃ beats 19/24 | 12% |
| ARC-AGI-1 public evaluation set (ARC Prize model_baseline, pass@2) | 94.6% ✎ | ▁·▇▃▁·█▇▁·▇▃ beats 21/27 | 3.2% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $57.75/M · $21 in / $168 out per 1M tokens · 400k context · developers.openai.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, OpenAI API standard processing, model page 'gpt-5.2-pro' whose default snapshot is gpt-5.2-pro-2025-12-11: input $21, output $168; cached-input, Batch and other tiers excluded. Currency: USD. OpenAI official model page, observed 2026-09-28.
$ how the score was worked out · Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 84%, ARC Prize Foundation model_ba… 16%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 84% | |
| 2 | 16% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 77.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json