whatmodel.sh / Dolly v2 12B

Dolly v2 12B is an open-weights language model from Databricks, released April 2023. Its published size is 12B parameters. Licence: mit.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'dolly-v2-12b' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'dolly-v2-12b' as 'Dolly-V2-12B' (Databricks, MIT), linking https://huggingface.co/databricks/dolly-v2-12b. Parameters: nominal size from the model name. Released 2023-04: Databricks blog 'Free Dolly' (databricks.com/blog/2023/04/12/dolly-first-open-commercially-viable-instruction-tuned-llm), datePublished 2023-04-12. LMArena's table links huggingface.co/databricks/dolly-v2-12b (MIT), which no longer resolves; no current download verified.

17.2±1.8comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 6 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Dolly v2 12B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Databricks.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
803BLOOM 3B BigScience18±1local~4GB2022-07
804FastChat-T5 3B LMSYS17±2local~8.5GB2023-04
805Dolly v2 12B Databricks17±2comparison only2023-04
806OPT-1.3B Meta16±1local~4.3GB2022-05
807Gemma 3 270M IT Google15±4local~1.7GB2025-08
more from Databricks
509DBRX Instruct Databricks46±1local~85GB2024-03

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▃▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #516 of 524 * · 12% of its score · 1 test

Beats Molmo 7B-D (0924), DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Qwen3 0.6B here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HumanEval7.9% ✎▄··▄····▄▄█▄ beats 2/6easy · avg 71%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%sharp · too hard for it
chat & writing▃▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #461 of 463 · 81% of its score · 4 tests

Trails Gemma 3 270M IT here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)856.0 ✎▃▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 2/95avg 1201▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 28%blunt
LMArena (text)982.4 ✎▃▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 2/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 28%blunt
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs)3.2800 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎▆▃▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 3/28avg 8.819 MT-Bench score (1-10)▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%sharp · noisy
MixInstruct GPT-Rank (LLM-Blender, mean rank among 11 instruction-tuned LLMs, ChatGPT pairwise judge)6.9000 mean rank (1-11) ✎█···▄··▄···▄ beats 2/4avg 6.444 mean rank (1-11)▇ 0.0%blunt · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 5.9% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
MMLU25.7% ✎▄▄·▄···▄▄·██ beats 0/8easy · avg 77%▇▇ 5.9%typical

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 28%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 28%, LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboa… 25% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json