whatmodel.sh / DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5
DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5
↗ share
+ contribute
DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 is an open-weights language model from DeepSeek, released January 2024. Its published size is 6.91B parameters. Licence: deepseek.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison-only. Maker repo deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5 @2a050a4: licence tag other (deepseek). 6,910,365,696 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2024-01: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2024-01-25). DeepSeek-Coder v1.5 instruct.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5, out of 828 with a score, then more from DeepSeek.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 461 | 48±2 | local | |||
| 462 | 48±1 | local | |||
| 463 | 48±1 | local | |||
| 464 | 48±2 | local | |||
| 465 | 48±1 | local | |||
| more from DeepSeek | |||||
| 21 | 78±1 | api $0.26/M +local | |||
| 31 | 76±1 | api $1.63/M +local | |||
| 35 | 76±3 | comparison only | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #291 of 458 · 86% of its score · 7 tests
Beats Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B), GLM-4.7-Flash here, though they rank higher overall. Trails DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat, WizardLM 70B V1.0, Yi 1.5 9B Chat here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval +1 | 75.6% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▃▄▆▅█▃▁▁ beats 74/99 | 51% |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▁▃▄▄▄█▃▁ beats 75/99 | 27% |
| MBPP+ | 62.2% ✎ | ▁···▁▁▂▅▇█▆▂ beats 42/75 | 5.0% |
| CodeReviewQA: change localisation (hard), invariant accuracy | 4.6% ✎ | █▂▁▁▃▂▂▃▅▅▅▇ beats 14/47 | 1.3% |
| CodeReviewQA: solution identification (hard), invariant accuracy | 11.4% ✎ | ▃··▁▂▃▃▂█▃▄▂ beats 9/47 | 1.2% |
| CodeReviewQA: automated code refinement, exact match rate | 36.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃█▅▄ beats 35/47 | 0.9% |
| CodeReviewQA: change type recognition, invariant accuracy | 58.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁······▁▃█ beats 9/47 | 0.0% |
other tests1 not in a task · 14% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvoEval (overall) | 48.8% ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▄█▁▄▅▃▁▃ beats 34/42 | 14% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 · needs ~4.2 GB · from huggingface.co/Edmon02chat in the terminal
llama cli -hf Edmon02/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf Edmon02/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 · needs ~4.2 GB · from huggingface.co/Edmon02
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/Edmon02/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run DeepSeek-Coder 7B Instruct v1.5 · needs ~4.2 GB · from huggingface.co/Edmon02chat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/Edmon02/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5-GGUF:Q4_K_M
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~13.82 GB · from huggingface.co/deepseek-ai
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1.5', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/deepseek-ai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · EvalPlus / EvalPerf published… 64%, Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top… 32%, CodeReviewQA: The Code Review… 3%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 64% | |
| 2 | 32% | |
| 4 | 3% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 47.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json