whatmodel.sh / decision / OpenThai-SystemOne (JevBench mini)
OpenThai-SystemOne (JevBench mini)
↗ share
+ contribute
OpenThai-SystemOne (JevBench mini) is a source-available decision implementation from iApp Technology.
Catalogue identity notes
JevBench 0.1.0 mini tested configuration openthai-systemone: Decoder, trained scorer head; base Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base (Thai continued pre-training); readout 256-slot decision head; questions read as one causal sequence. Separate identity because the report does not establish equivalence to the newer Decision Index checkpoint or serving recipe. No latency imported.
$ how it compares
The decision models ranked either side of OpenThai-SystemOne (JevBench mini), out of 357 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 236 | 46±1 | model files | |
| 237 | Kas 4B | 46±1 | model files |
| 238 | 46±2 | source code | |
| 239 | 46±1 | model files | |
| 240 | 46±2 | source code |
see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
consistency▃·▂▂·▅▃·▃▅▃█ #12 of 21 · 61% of its score · 5 tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Probability measure coherence (pass rate) | 39.7% ✎ | ▄·▁·▃▃▁·▃▄▁█ beats 10/20 | 43% |
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Representation consistency (pass rate) | 76.9% ✎ | ▃·▂·▂▂▂▃▅▅▃█ beats 10/20 | 14% |
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Logical coherence (pass rate) | 61.3% ✎ | ▃·▃·█▅▅██▃█▅ beats 1/20 | 2.3% |
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Choice-set coherence (pass rate) | 72.2% ✎ | ▁▃▄█▄▄·····▄ beats 7/20 | 1.2% |
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Batch independence (pass rate) | 70.8% ✎ | ▃··········█ beats 1/20 | 0.0% |
other tests1 not in a task · 37% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| JevBench mini 0.1.0 · unchanged-answer accuracy | 82.4% ✎ | ▁·▂·▂···▃▂▁█ beats 7/20 | 37% |
$ where to run it
Implementation and setup instructions ↗
Published implementation and setup documentation verified. This entry describes a decision readout or evaluated configuration, not necessarily separate trained weights. Follow the referenced version and model settings; hardware compatibility has not been verified. Source · checked 2026-10-31.
Model repository and documentation: github.com/iapp-technology ↗
$ how the score was worked out · JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluatio… 98%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 98% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 46.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json