whatmodel.sh / decision / jev-d3-46k
jev-d3-46k
↗ share
+ contribute
jev-d3-46k is an open-weights decision model from tinnel123. Its published size is 26.09B parameters.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact Decision Index tested engine jev-d3-46k; reported model jev-d3-46k. Type: full fine-tune; technique: autoregressive. Comparison entry; no current run command, API price or speed inferred from the benchmark. Current repository metadata checked separately; an unpinned alias is not evidence that today’s weights reproduce this historical run.
Model information sources
Publisher parameter count; includes the served backbone, not just adapter size.
$ how it compares
The decision models ranked either side of jev-d3-46k, out of 357 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 122 | Decider chat · Qwen3.6-27B (decision readout) | 59±1 | source code |
| 123 | 59±1 | model files | |
| 124 | jev-d3-46k | 59±4 | model files |
| 125 | 59±4 | local | |
| 126 | 58±1 | local |
see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
vision▁·▃▂▃▃▇▄▄█▄▃ #39 of 79 · 95% of its score · 12 tests
Beats Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3, Clef-omni here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Clef-flash here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Mind2Web (chance-corrected points) submitted | 77.6600 points ✎ | ▁·▁▁▃▁▄▄▃▅█▂ beats 36/61 | 12% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · MMMU-Pro vision (chance-corrected points) submitted | 32.1100 points ✎ | ▁▁▅▁▄▁▄█▄▃▇▇ beats 33/61 | 11% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Winoground (chance-corrected points) submitted | 80.7500 points ✎ | ▁·▁▁▁▁·▂▁▃▅█ beats 34/61 | 10% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4: private same skills (points) | 59.0800 points ✎ | ▁▁▃▃▁▂▄▆▃▃▅█ beats 37/61 | 10% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · Moderation (Hateful Memes) (chance-corrected points) submitted | 45.4200 points ✎ | ▆▃▃▆▄▄▇██▁▆▆ beats 48/61 | 8.8% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · RealWorldQA (chance-corrected points) submitted | 58.3800 points ✎ | ▁·▂▂▁▃▃▅▅▃▂█ beats 25/61 | 8.0% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · CharXiv (chance-corrected points) submitted | 72.6800 points ✎ | ▂▁▁▁▁▃▁▅▅▆██ beats 33/61 | 7.8% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · InfographicVQA (chance-corrected points) submitted | 91.2600 points ✎ | ▁·▁▂▁▁▃▁▂▃▅█ beats 29/61 | 6.2% |
4 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · R-Bench-M (chance-corrected points) submitted | 17.1600 points ✎ | ▂▄▇▆█▄▄▇▂··▁ beats 17/61 | 6.2% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · BLINK (chance-corrected points) submitted | 55.0500 points ✎ | ▁···▁▂▂▂█▄▂▃ beats 36/61 | 5.9% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · CV-Bench (chance-corrected points) submitted | 74.5800 points ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▁▁▁▄█▃▃ beats 29/61 | 4.7% |
| Decision Index Vision 0.4 · KIE (CORD+FUNSD) (chance-corrected points) submitted | 91.8500 points ✎ | ▁··▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▁ beats 35/61 | 3.4% |
$ where to run it
Download model files ↗
Published model files verified. This is a verified repository snapshot; the benchmark does not establish an identical weight revision. A local run command and hardware requirements have not been verified for this entry. Source · checked 2026-10-31.
Model repository and documentation: huggingface.co/tinnel123 ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Decision Index Vision 0.4 95%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 95% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 5% | |
| weighted average | = 58.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json