whatmodel.sh / decision / decider-2b v10 (JevBench mini)

decider-2b v10 (JevBench mini) is a source-available decision implementation from Mapika.

Catalogue identity notes

JevBench 0.1.0 mini tested configuration decider-2b: Decoder, answer-letter logits; base Qwen3.5-2B-Base; readout fine-tune + calibration-aware RL; option-letter logits. Separate identity because the report does not establish equivalence to the newer Decision Index checkpoint or serving recipe. No latency imported.

47.1±2.3#230 of 355 decision modelsfrom 6 benchmark results across 1 source

$ how it compares

The decision models ranked either side of decider-2b v10 (JevBench mini), out of 357 with a score, then more from Mapika.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
230Lev1 3.7B theaviv47±1model files2026-10-04
231Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 (decision readout) csabag47±1source code
232decider-2b v10 (JevBench mini) Mapika47±2source code
233Jev-Style 2B v4 chaoliangUNSW47±1model files
234Saracura PT-BR 4B Felhen46±1model files
more from Mapika
43Decider 31B (NVFP4) Mapika66±1model files2026-10
85Decider chat · Gemma-4-31B (decision readout) Mapika62±1source code
110decider-35b-a3b (DecisionBench d9783c58) Mapika60±2model files2026-09-20

see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

consistency▃·▂▂·▅▃·▃▅▃█ #11 of 21 · 62% of its score · 5 tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Probability measure coherence (pass rate)38.0% ✎▄·▁·▃▃▁·▃▄▁█ beats 9/20medium · avg 43%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 45%sharp · at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Representation consistency (pass rate)78.6% ✎▃·▂·▂▂▂▃▅▅▃█ beats 12/20easy · avg 79%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%typical
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Logical coherence (pass rate)67.1% ✎▃·▃·█▅▅██▃█▅ beats 2/20easy · avg 78%▇ 2.3%blunt
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Choice-set coherence (pass rate)75.0% ✎▁▃▄█▄▄·····▄ beats 9/20easy · avg 79%▇ 1.2%noisy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Batch independence (pass rate)100.0% ✎▁··········█ beats 8/20very easy · avg 97%▇ 0.0%blunt · maxed out · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 36% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · unchanged-answer accuracy84.9% ✎▁·▂·▂···▂▃▁█ beats 8/20very easy · avg 87%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 36%sharp

$ where to run it

Implementation and setup instructions ↗
Published implementation and setup documentation verified. This entry describes a decision readout or evaluated configuration, not necessarily separate trained weights. Follow the referenced version and model settings; hardware compatibility has not been verified. Source · checked 2026-10-31.

Model repository and documentation: github.com/Mapika ↗

$ how the score was worked out · JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluatio… 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluation reports6Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 47.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json