whatmodel.sh / decision / Bespoke-Nimble-9B (JevBench mini)

Bespoke-Nimble-9B (JevBench mini) is a source-available decision implementation from Bespoke Labs.

Catalogue identity notes

JevBench 0.1.0 mini tested configuration bespoke-nimble-9b: Decoder, answer-letter logits; base Qwen3.5-9B; readout LoRA scoring one-letter answer tokens; whole schema in every prompt. JevBench shim (Nimble's own Modal server does not run locally); same request mapping as Nimble's compiler.py, PyTorch reference runner, current checkpoint Separate identity because the report does not establish equivalence to the newer Decision Index checkpoint or serving recipe. No latency imported.

52.6±2.4#184 of 355 decision modelsfrom 6 benchmark results across 1 source

$ how it compares

The decision models ranked either side of Bespoke-Nimble-9B (JevBench mini), out of 357 with a score, then more from Bespoke Labs.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
184decider-2b (DecisionBench fa996cea) Mapika53±2model files2026-09-19
185cua-s1-4b-0.2 (DecisionBench 16818868) cua-ai53±2model files
186Bespoke-Nimble-9B (JevBench mini) Bespoke Labs53±2source code
187Hopper 12B (trained) HopitAI52±1model files
188Jebadiah 9B v2 (JevBench mini) Frontier Infra52±2source code
more from Bespoke Labs
15Bespoke Nimble v4 Max (27B) Bespoke Labs70±1model files2026-10
135Bespoke Nimble 9B v3 Bespoke Labs58±1local~21GB2026-10-06
172Bespoke-Nimble-9B (DecisionBench 594dfdcf) Bespoke Labs54±2model files

see all decision models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

consistency▃·▂▂·▅▃·▃▅▃█ #6 of 21 · 68% of its score · 5 tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Probability measure coherence (pass rate)50.5% ✎▄·▁·▃▃▁·▃▄▁█ beats 17/20medium · avg 43%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 51%sharp · at its level
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Representation consistency (pass rate)76.4% ✎▃·▂·▂▂▂▃▅▅▃█ beats 9/20easy · avg 79%▇▇▇▇▇ 13%typical
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Logical coherence (pass rate)87.1% ✎▃·▃·█▅▅██▃█▅ beats 19/20easy · avg 78%▇ 2.3%blunt
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Choice-set coherence (pass rate)63.9% ✎▁▃▄█▄▄·····▄ beats 3/20easy · avg 79%▇ 1.2%noisy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · Batch independence (pass rate)68.3% ✎▃··········█ beats 0/20very easy · avg 97%▇ 0.0%blunt · maxed out · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 30% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
JevBench mini 0.1.0 · unchanged-answer accuracy89.1% ✎▁·▂·▂···▂▂▁█ beats 18/20very easy · avg 87%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 30%sharp

$ where to run it

Implementation and setup instructions ↗
Published implementation and setup documentation verified. This entry describes a decision readout or evaluated configuration, not necessarily separate trained weights. Follow the referenced version and model settings; hardware compatibility has not been verified. Source · checked 2026-10-31.

Model repository and documentation: github.com/bespokelabsai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluatio… 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
JevBench 0.1.0 mini evaluation reports6Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 52.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json