whatmodel.sh / image / CogView4-6B

CogView4-6B is an open-weights image model from Z.ai, released March 2025. Its published size is 6B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Zhipu/Z.ai CogView4 text-to-image model, 6B DiT (zai-org/CogView4-6B, pinned 63a52b7, Apache-2.0; the only CogView4 release). MMMG Table 2 'CogView-4' (1024 px, DM) and the HPSv3 README benchmark 'CogView4'. Comparison-only.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

6B as named by the maker (CogView4-6B DiT); GLM-4-9B text encoder separate.

40.6±5.5comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 2 benchmark results across 2 sources* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of CogView4-6B, out of 197 with a score, then more from Z.ai.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
140Playground v2.5 Playground41±2local~8.8GB2024-02
141Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Stability AI41±3api $0.035/image +local~20GB2024-10
142CogView4-6B Z.ai41±6comparison only2025-03
143Midjourney V7 Midjourney40±3comparison only2025-04
144UniWorld-V1 PKU-YuanGroup40±2comparison only2025-06
more from Z.ai
102GLM-Image Z.ai50±2api $0.015/image +local~39GB2026-01

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▁▂▇▇▆▅█▇▂▃▁▁ #110 of 157 * · 87% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ), OmniGen2 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Show-o2 1.5B-HQ here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
MMMG knowledge-image generation (MMMG-Score, average over education levels)13.1% ✎▃··▃·█▃▃▅··▃ beats 3/9hard · avg 24%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 77%typical
HPSv3 image generation benchmark (Overall HPSv3 score)9.6100 ✎▃·····▃··▃·█ beats 2/5avg 10.058▇▇▇▇ 10%sharp · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/zai-org ↗

$ how the score was worked out · MMMG: A Massive, Multidiscipl… 77%, HPSv3 repository README, imag… 10%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
MMMG: A Massive, Multidisciplinary, Multi-Tier Generation Benchmark for Text-to-Image Reasoning (arXiv:2506.10963v2)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 77%CC-BY-SA-4.0
HPSv3 repository README, image generation benchmark table (MizzenAI/HPSv3)1▇▇▇ 10%MIT
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇▇ 13%
weighted average= 40.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json