whatmodel.sh / video / CogVideoX-2B
CogVideoX-2B
↗ share
+ contribute
CogVideoX-2B is an open-weights video model from Zhipu AI (THUDM), released August 2024. Its published size is 2B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
$ how it compares
The video models ranked either side of CogVideoX-2B, out of 139 with a score, then more from Zhipu AI (THUDM).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 36±3 | api $0.040/sec +local | |||
| 113 | 36±2 | local | |||
| 114 | 36±2 | local | |||
| 115 | 36±2 | api $0.040/sec | |||
| 116 | 35±2 | local | |||
| more from Zhipu AI (THUDM) | |||||
| 85 | 46±4 | local | |||
| 91 | 44±2 | api price unknown +local | |||
$ what it's good at
text to video▆▄▃▄▆▅█▃▂▂▂▄ #52 of 68 · 98% of its score · 4 tests
Beats CogVideoX1.5-5B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Pika 2.2 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenAI-Arena text-to-video (anonymous Elo) | 1053.5 ✎ | ▃▃···▅▃·▃▅·█ beats 6/10 | 42% |
| VideoPhy (human, SA=1 & PC=1) | 18.6% ✎ | ▄▄▄·▄▄█····▄ beats 4/7 | 37% |
| VideoPhy (auto-evaluator average) | 39.0% ✎ | ▅·▃▅··▃█···▃ beats 5/9 | 11% |
| ChronoMagic-Bench-150 GPT4o-MTScore (time-lapse metamorphosis) | 61.8% ✎ | ▄·▄█▄▄▄·▄·▄█ beats 9/10 | 8.5% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~5.3 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/THUDM (official)
python -c "import torch;from diffusers import CogVideoXPipeline;from diffusers.utils import export_to_video;p=CogVideoXPipeline.from_pretrained('THUDM/CogVideoX-2b',torch_dtype=torch.float16);p.enable_sequential_cpu_offload();p.vae.enable_slicing();p.vae.enable_tiling();export_to_video(p(prompt='A panda playing a tiny guitar in a bamboo forest',num_inference_steps=50,num_frames=49,guidance_scale=6).frames[0],'output.mp4',fps=8)"
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/zai-org ↗
$ how the score was worked out · VideoPhy / VideoPhy-2 officia… 48%, GenAI-Arena (TIGER-Lab) text-… 42%, ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmar… 8%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 48% | |
| 1 | 42% | |
| 1 | 8% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 36.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json