whatmodel.sh / Codex code-cushman-001

Codex code-cushman-001 is a closed-weights language model from OpenAI, released August 2021. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Smaller first-generation OpenAI Codex API model 'code-cushman-001' (OpenAI deprecations page, Codex models, shut down 2023-03-23). Release month from the 2021-08-10 Codex API private-beta announcement (archived). Parameter count never officially published.

Model information sources

Release date ↗

34.7±5.0comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 2 benchmark results across 2 sources* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

Score within the LMArena (text) comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Codex code-cushman-001, out of 1182 with a score, then more from OpenAI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
1025Vicuna 7B v1.3 LMSYS35±2local~5.8GB2023-06
1026Stable Code 3B Stability AI35±1local~4.8GB2024-01
1027Codex code-cushman-001 OpenAI35±5comparison only2021-08
1028T0 11B BigScience35±3comparison only2021-10
1029Qwen1.5 4B Chat Alibaba34±2local~4.1GB2024-02
more from OpenAI
1GPT-6 Astra OpenAI86±1api $20.00/M2026-09
3GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI84±1api $4.00/M2026-09
8GPT-6 Sol OpenAI81±1api $4.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests2 not in a task · 89% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ARCADE New Tasks pass@1 (notebook-context prompting)8.9% ✎█·█········█ beats 1/2hard · avg 23%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 47%small run
ODEX English pass@1 (zero-shot)31.9% ✎▄▄········▄█ beats 0/4medium · avg 58%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 42%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Natural Language to Code Gene… 47%, Execution-Based Evaluation fo… 42%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Natural Language to Code Generation in Interactive Data Science Notebooks — authors' own runs1CC BY 4.0
Execution-Based Evaluation for Open-Domain Code Generation — authors' own runs1CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 34.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json