whatmodel.sh / ChatGLM2-6B

ChatGLM2-6B is an open-weights language model from Zhipu AI (THUDM), released June 2023. Its published size is 6B parameters. Licence: chatglm2-6b-license.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'chatglm2-6b' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'chatglm2-6b' as 'ChatGLM2-6B' (Tsinghua, Apache-2.0), linking https://huggingface.co/THUDM/chatglm2-6b. Maker repo zai-org/chatglm2-6b @d2e2d91: licence tag none tagged. Parameters: nominal size from the model name. Released 2023-06: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-06-24).

Model information sources

· Weights licence ↗

24.8±1.6#674 of 719 LLMsfrom 6 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of ChatGLM2-6B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Zhipu AI (THUDM).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
777Pythia 12B EleutherAI25±1local~9.5GB2023-02
778RedPajama-INCITE Base 3B v1 Together25±3local~3.4GB2023-05
779ChatGLM2-6B Zhipu AI (THUDM)25±2local~15GB2023-06
780GPT-J 6B EleutherAI25±1local~14GB2021-06
781OpenLLaMA 3B v2 OpenLM Research25±1local~4.2GB2023-07
more from Zhipu AI (THUDM)
349GLM-4 9B Chat 1M Zhipu AI (THUDM)53±5local~8.1GB2024-06
485CogVLM2 Llama3 Chinese Chat 19B Zhipu AI (THUDM)47±7comparison only2024-05
569CogVLM2 Llama3 Chat 19B Zhipu AI (THUDM)43±3local~43GB2024-05

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▃▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #387 of 393 · 96% of its score · 5 tests

Beats Phi-2 (2.7B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)930.0 ✎▂▁▃▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 7/95avg 1201▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 23%blunt
LMArena (text)1024.7 ✎▁▃▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 6/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 23%blunt
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs)4.9600 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎▆▂▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 8/28avg 8.819 MT-Bench score (1-10)▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%sharp · noisy
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled4.4% ✎▁▃▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 5/122medium · avg 39%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%too hard for it
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge)47.1% ✎▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 7/45very easy · avg 96%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%sharp · at its level · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 2.8% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks)47.2% ✎▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▃▂█▅▁ beats 62/276medium · avg 73%▇ 2.8%noisy

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~12.49 GB, NVIDIA only · from github.com/vllm-project
    vllm serve zai-org/chatglm2-6b --trust-remote-code

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/zai-org ↗

$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 29%, Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 23%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 23% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json