whatmodel.sh / image / Boogu-Image-0.1 Base

Boogu-Image-0.1 Base is an open-weights image model from Boogu project, released June 2026. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Boogu project's Boogu-Image-0.1 Base text-to-image model (Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base, pinned 334ad7e, Apache-2.0; card: 'a research project only, and not an official model release'; technical report arXiv 2607.13125, authors unrelated to UltraText). UltraText Table 5 lists 'Boogu-Image-0.1-Base' among open-weight models. Not mapped: 'Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo' (a hotfix revision of the Turbo weights was published on 2026-06-25 alongside the original, and the benchmark does not say which). Comparison-only.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

66.6±5.2comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of Boogu-Image-0.1 Base, out of 197 with a score.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
20Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro (2026-06-22) Alibaba67±2api $0.075/image2026-06
21Uni-1.1 Luma AI67±2api $0.040/image2026-05
22Boogu-Image-0.1 Base Boogu project67±5comparison only2026-06
23Ideogram 4.0 Ideogram66±2api $0.060/image +local~6.1GB2026-06
24Qwen-Image 2.0 Pro Alibaba66±3api $0.075/image2026-03

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▁▂▇▇▆▅█▇▃▃▁▁ #20 of 157 * · 88% of its score · 1 test

Beats Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro (2026-06-22), Uni-1.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen-Image 2.0 Pro, Ideogram 4.0 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
UltraText Bench (Composite, bilingual dense text rendering)77.9% ✎▁▂▂█▃▁▃▃·▁·▁ beats 16/22hard · avg 28%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 88%sharp · at its level · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/Boogu ↗

$ how the score was worked out · UltraText Bench: A Comprehens… 88%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
UltraText Bench: A Comprehensive Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Text Rendering in Image Generation (arXiv:2610.09823v1)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 88%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇ 12%
weighted average= 66.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json