whatmodel.sh / tts / Antalia 1

Antalia 1 is an open-weights text-to-speech model from Patientdesk.ai, released September 2026. Its published size is 0.305B parameters. Licence: openrail.

Catalogue identity notes

Patientdesk.ai's Antalia 1 open-weights Turkish TTS (305M; cloud0day3/antalia-1, pinned eaec2aa, card licence openrail). EMA's card footnote: '"Antalia 1" by Sezgin Saygili, Emre Kaplaner, Oncel Ozgul and Fikri San Koktas (Patientdesk.ai): huggingface.co/cloud0day3/antalia-1. Three of its takes failed inside its own code and count as silence.' The Antalia re-run uses the release recipe (inference-recipe.json) per harness/systems/run_antalia.py.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

305M as printed in both tables.

16.7±2.9comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 2 benchmark results across 2 sources* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

Score within the Vapi Humanness · Bradley–Terry rating, 2026-09-25 snapshot comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The text-to-speech models ranked either side of Antalia 1, out of 148 with a score, then more from Patientdesk.ai.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
143YourTTS Coqui / Edresson Casanova et al.18±3local~0.4GB2021-12
144MMS TTS Turkish Meta18±4local~0.2GB2023-09
145Antalia 1 Patientdesk.ai17±3comparison only2026-09
146Amphion NaturalSpeech 2 (LibriTTS) Amphion (CUHK-Shenzhen)14±3local~1.7GB2023-12
147Glow-TTS Common Voice (Turkish) Coqui TTS / Fatih Akademi11±4local~4GB2022-03
more from Patientdesk.ai
110Antalia-2 Mini Patientdesk.ai40±4comparison only2026-10

see all text-to-speech models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests1 not in a task · 97% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Freya-TR-Eval Turkish TTS intelligibility (WER, faster-whisper large-v3, 8 kHz band) lab +16.3% ✎▄··▄··▄···▂█ beats 3/10avg 0.3%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%several runs

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/cloud0day3 ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Antalia-2 Mini model card (cl… 53%, EMA Lightning model card (can… 43%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Antalia-2 Mini model card (cloud0day3/antalia-mini), public Freya-TR-Eval re-run table · lab-reported1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 53%Apache-2.0
EMA Lightning model card (canberkkkkkk/ema-lightning), Benchmarks: Freya-TR-Eval1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 43%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 16.7

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json